· 2014· Book chapter
Routledge Handbook of Human-Animal Studies
- 196citations
- 2014year
Short summary
Observer stance (subjectivist vs. objectivist) shapes the observed behaviors and perceived identity of Arabian babblers, blurring wild/domesticated/feral categories.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Observer interaction (subjectivist) versus distance (objectivist) influences observed behaviors in Arabian babblers.
- Different observer practices 'produce' different versions of the birds and impact scientific theories.
- Arabian babblers exhibit behaviors like cooperative feeding, mobbing, and play.
- The birds' identity appears fluid, existing at the edge of wild/domesticated/feral categories based on observation methods.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The “Arabian babblers” are observed in the Neguev desert for more than 40 years. These birds live in cooperative groups. They offer presents to feed each other, they endanger themselves by mobbing raptors or by coming to the rescue of group members. They play and they also often dance together. All these behaviors have received various and controversial interpretations in the scientific literature. Following the actual field’s work, one may observe that these interpretations are closely linked to the way scientists observe the birds, or even deal with them. Different practices not only construe but actually “produce” different birds. Roughly said, some of the observers take a “subjectivist” stance and interact with the birds, the other one takes an “objectivist” stance, and keeps distance from them. Each of these practices has different effects, on the birds, and on the theories. These birds therefore appear just at the edge of the categories of wild/domesticated/feral, their identity seeming to change accordingly to the ethologist who observes them.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2014 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Religious studies
Religious studiesArts and Humanities