PofoliaShared via Pofolia

· 2012

The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church

J. L. Houlden

Short summary

A 1994 Pontifical Biblical Commission document, now published in book form, endorses modern biblical interpretation methods and rejects literalism, despite a conservative trend in other Catholic teachings.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The Pontifical Biblical Commission's 1994 document endorses modern biblical interpretation methods.
  • It explicitly rejects conservative literalism and fundamentalist approaches to the Bible.
  • The document provides a succinct, exhaustive, and lucid account of scripture analysis and interpretation techniques.
  • Its publication in book form makes it more accessible than its original limited-circulation journal release.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

In February 1994 a quite remarkable document appeared from the Pontifical Biblical Commission with a preface by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, on The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church. It is remarkable, because at a time when official Roman Catholic teachings like Veritatis Splendor and the new World Catechism have displayed marked conservatism, it represents an endorsement of all the main types of modern biblical interpretation, and firmly rejects conservative literalism and fundamentalist ways of using the Bible. There was one snag: the document was published in instalments in a journal with limited circulation, and not at all easy to obtain. Certainly there was no active promotion of it. Hence its present publication in book form. The document itself, which forms the bulk of the book, is a succinct but exhaustive and 'lucid account of the various methods that are now used in the analysis and interpretation of scripture with a judicious evaluation and discussion of applications. It would make an admirable introductory textbook. To this have been added some previously published reviews and discussions from Britain, the Netherlands and the United States, and three specially commissioned articles commenting on the document from different perspectives, by Robert Carroll, John Muddiman and Kenneth Stevenson. Leslie Houlden contributes the article in which he introduces the document, and a preface.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Religious studies

Religious studiesArts and Humanities