PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Transcultural Psychiatry· 2014Q1

Is mindfulness Buddhist? (and why it matters)

Robert H. Sharf

Short summary

Modern mindfulness, promoting "bare attention" for therapeutic effects, is rooted in 20th-century Burmese Buddhist reforms, not traditional Theravāda doctrine, and mirrors historical innovations in Chinese Zen and Tibetan Dzogchen.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Modern mindfulness "bare attention" derives from 20th-century Burmese Buddhist reforms.
  • This approach may conflict with traditional Theravāda Buddhist doctrine.
  • Similar innovations occurred in medieval Chinese Zen and Tibetan Dzogchen.
  • These historical reforms aimed for lay accessibility and quick results.
  • Innovations often met suspicion from traditional Buddhist quarters.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Modern exponents of mindfulness meditation promote the therapeutic effects of "bare attention"--a sort of non-judgmental, non-discursive attending to the moment-to-moment flow of consciousness. This approach to Buddhist meditation can be traced to Burmese Buddhist reform movements of the first half of the 20th century, and is arguably at odds with more traditional Theravāda Buddhist doctrine and meditative practices. But the cultivation of present-centered awareness is not without precedent in Buddhist history; similar innovations arose in medieval Chinese Zen (Chan) and Tibetan Dzogchen. These movements have several things in common. In each case the reforms were, in part, attempts to render Buddhist practice and insight accessible to laypersons unfamiliar with Buddhist philosophy and/or unwilling to adopt a renunciatory lifestyle. In addition, these movements all promised astonishingly quick results. And finally, the innovations in practice were met with suspicion and criticism from traditional Buddhist quarters. Those interested in the therapeutic effects of mindfulness and bare attention are often not aware of the existence, much less the content, of the controversies surrounding these practices in Asian Buddhist history.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Transcultural Psychiatry, 2014 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Religious studies

Religious studiesArts and Humanities