PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Choice Reviews Online· 2013

Artificial hells: participatory art and the politics of spectatorship

Short summary

This book offers the first historical and theoretical overview of socially engaged participatory art, critically examining its claims for emancipation and questioning the turn to ethical criteria over artistic ones.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Provides the first historical and theoretical overview of socially engaged participatory art.
  • Traces the trajectory of participatory art through key moments and movements of the 20th century.
  • Critically examines the claims of artists and critics regarding democracy and emancipation.
  • Questions the emphasis on ethical criteria over artistic merit in participatory art.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

For over a decade, conceptual and performance art has been dominated by participatory art. Its champions, such as French curator Nicolas Bourriaud (who invented the term relational aesthetics to describe it) and American art historian Grant Kester, believe that by encouraging an audience to join in, the artist can promote new emancipatory social relations. Artificial Hells is the first historical and theoretical overview of socially engaged participatory art. The book follows the trajectory of twentieth-century art and examines key moments in the development of the participatory aesthetic, in both Europe and America. This itinerary takes in Futurism, Dada, Situationism, Czechoslovakian Happenings, and Argentinean Conceptualism, and concludes with contemporary artists such as Thomas Hirschhorn, Tania Bruguera and Jeremy Deller. Since her controversial essay in Artforum in 2006, Claire Bishop has been one of the few to expose the political and aesthetic limitations of this work. In Artificial Hells she not only scrutinizes the claims for democracy and emancipation that the artists and critics make for the work, but also questions the turn to ethical (rather than artistic) criteria invited by such participatory and collaborative art.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Choice Reviews Online, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Visual Arts and Performing ArtsArts and Humanities