PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Electronics· 2026Q2· Review

Toward Agentic TestOps: A Systematic Literature Review and Autonomy Taxonomy for AI-Driven Testing in DevOps

Hanae Hanim, Chafik Baidada, Mohamed Hanine, Waeal J. Obidallah

Short summary

A systematic literature review of 31 AI-driven testing studies in DevOps found 87% only automate isolated tasks, with none demonstrating lifecycle-wide, goal-driven orchestration, revealing a critical autonomy gap.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 87% of AI-driven testing approaches in DevOps operate at task-level assistance.
  • Only 3% of reviewed studies demonstrated stage-level integration.
  • No reviewed study achieved lifecycle-wide, goal-driven orchestration of testing activities.
  • A lack of standardized criteria for evaluating testing autonomy and limited empirical validation were identified.
  • A four-level autonomy taxonomy for AI-driven testing is introduced.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

As DevOps pipelines accelerate release cycles from weeks to hours, testing practices face a fundamental misalignment: most AI-driven approaches automate isolated tasks rather than orchestrating testing activities across the delivery lifecycle. Although generative AI has broadened the capabilities of software testing, this task-centric focus leaves a critical autonomy gap unaddressed. To characterize this gap, this study presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of AI-driven software testing in DevOps environments. Through a structured and reproducible methodology that assessed study quality, 31 articles were selected from Scopus and Web of Science. The SLR evaluates the level of autonomy achieved by existing approaches and examines their integration within continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines. Within the journal-based corpus captured by the predefined review protocol, 27 of the 31 articles (87%) operate at task-level assistance, 3 (10%) demonstrate stage-level integration, only 1 (3%) exhibits partially agentic behavior within a bounded domain, and none demonstrates lifecycle-wide, goal-driven orchestration. Two additional shortcomings emerge from the literature: the absence of standardized criteria for evaluating testing autonomy and the limited empirical validation of proposed approaches in operational CI/CD environments. Based on these findings, this study introduces a four-level autonomy taxonomy for AI-driven testing and outlines the architectural, operational, and governance conditions required for future Agentic TestOps systems, understood as goal-driven and self-adaptive testing systems operating across delivery pipelines. Together, these contributions help define a research agenda for advancing DevOps testing toward more autonomous testing approaches.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Electronics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Software

SoftwareComputer Science