PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Management· 2016Q1

Organizations Driving Positive Social Change

Ute Stephan, Malcolm Patterson, Ciara Kelly, Johanna Mair

Short summary

This paper introduces a framework distinguishing between surface- and deep-level strategies for organizations driving positive social change (PSC), based on distinct combinations of change mechanisms and organizational practices.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Introduces a conceptual framework for understanding how organizations drive positive social change (PSC).
  • Differentiates between surface-level and deep-level PSC strategies.
  • Strategies are defined by distinct combinations of change mechanisms and enabling organizational practices.
  • Strategies differ in the nature, speed, quality, timing, and reach of social impact.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Academic and practitioner interest in how market-based organizations can drive positive social change (PSC) is steadily growing. This paper helps to recast how organizations relate to society. It integrates research on projects stimulating PSC—the transformational processes to advance societal well-being—that is fragmented across different streams of research in management and related disciplines. Focusing on the mechanisms at play in how organizations and their projects affect change in targets outside of organizational boundaries, we (1) clarify the nature of PSC as a process, (2) develop an integrative framework that specifies two distinct PSC strategies, (3) take stock of and offer a categorization scheme for change mechanisms and enabling organizational practices, and (4) outline opportunities for future research. Our conceptual framework differentiates between surface- and deep-level PSC strategies understood as distinct combinations of change mechanisms and enabling organizational practices. These strategies differ in the nature and speed of transformation experienced by the targets of change projects and the resulting quality (pervasiveness and durability), timing, and reach of social impact. Our findings provide a solid base for integrating and advancing knowledge across the largely disparate streams of management research on corporate social responsibility, social entrepreneurship, and base of the pyramid and open up important new avenues for future research on organizing for PSC and on unpacking PSC processes.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Management, 2016 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Business and International Management

Business and International ManagementBusiness, Management and Accounting