Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences· 2026Q1
Environmental vulnerability and governance in the Red River Delta, Vietnam: analysis and strategic recommendations
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Environmental vulnerability in Vietnam's Red River Delta is significantly shaped by governance failures, with food security vulnerability (CVI2 = 0.245) high across all income groups and psychosocial vulnerability (CVI5 = 0.185) unexpectedly high even among the wealthy.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Food security vulnerability (CVI2 = 0.245) affects all income groups in the Red River Delta.
- Economic vulnerability (CVI1 = 0.322) is concentrated among low-income households.
- Psychosocial vulnerability (CVI5 = 0.185) is unexpectedly high, especially for high-income households (CVI5 = 0.220).
- Overall vulnerability (HVI = 0.210) is highest for low-income households, but wealth does not eliminate risk.
- Five institutional constraints, such as prioritizing economic growth and excluding community input, are linked to vulnerability.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Environmental vulnerability in deltaic regions is increasingly associated with governance failures rather than biophysical exposure alone. This study aims to examine how institutional arrangements shape household environmental vulnerability in Vietnam’s Red River Delta. An integrated mixed-methods approach was employed, combining household surveys (n = 1,000) across three provinces (Hanoi, Hung Yen, and Nam Dinh) using an adapted Household Vulnerability Assessment Tool (HVAT) with qualitative policy document analysis Results reveal that food security vulnerability (CVI2 = 0.245) is elevated across all income groups, while economic vulnerability concentrates among low-income households (CVI1 = 0.322). Psychosocial vulnerability ranks unexpectedly high overall (CVI5 = 0.185), particularly among high-income households (CVI5 = 0.220), while overall vulnerability is highest among low-income households (HVI = 0.210), followed by high-income (HVI = 0.181) and middle-income groups (HVI = 0.170), indicating that wealth alone does not eliminate environmental risks. Governance analysis identifies five institutional constraints associated with these vulnerabilities: subordination of environmental protection to economic development, procedural vagueness, exclusion of community participation, weak accountability, and implementation deficits. Each governance pattern corresponds to specific measured vulnerability outcomes, consistent with the proposition that institutional performance shapes environmental risk alongside biophysical exposure and economic resources. The recommendations indicate that effective vulnerability reduction in deltaic regions requires governance reforms prioritizing accountability mechanisms, community monitoring authority, and vulnerability-based policy frameworks rather than infrastructure investments alone.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Development
DevelopmentSocial Sciences