PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Management· 2012Q1· Review

What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility

Herman Aguinis, Ante Glavas

Short summary

This review synthesizes 588 articles and 102 books on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into a multilevel, multidisciplinary framework, identifying key knowledge gaps and proposing a future research agenda.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A new theoretical framework integrates CSR literature across institutional, organizational, and individual levels.
  • The framework accounts for reactive/proactive CSR predictors and internal/external outcomes.
  • Key knowledge gaps include understanding underlying mechanisms and micro-level (individual/team) CSR research.
  • A detailed research agenda is proposed, emphasizing multilevel perspectives and microfoundations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The authors review the corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature based on 588 journal articles and 102 books and book chapters. They offer a multilevel and multidisciplinary theoretical framework that synthesizes and integrates the literature at the institutional, organizational, and individual levels of analysis. The framework includes reactive and proactive predictors of CSR actions and policies and the outcomes of such actions and policies, which they classify as primarily affecting internal (i.e., internal outcomes) or external (i.e., external outcomes) stakeholders. The framework includes variables that explain underlying mechanisms (i.e., relationship- and value-based mediator variables) of CSR–outcomes relationships and contingency effects (i.e., people-, place-, price-, and profile-based moderator variables) that explain conditions under which the relationship between CSR and its outcomes change. The authors’ review reveals important knowledge gaps related to the adoption of different theoretical orientations by researchers studying CSR at different levels of analysis, the need to understand underlying mechanisms linking CSR with outcomes, the need for research at micro levels of analysis (i.e., individuals and teams), and the need for methodological approaches that will help address these substantive knowledge gaps. Accordingly, they offer a detailed research agenda for the future, based on a multilevel perspective that aims to integrate diverse theoretical frameworks as well as develop an understanding of underlying mechanisms and microfoundations of CSR (i.e., foundations based on individual action and interactions). The authors also provide specific suggestions regarding research design, measurement, and data-analytic approaches that will be instrumental in carrying out their proposed research agenda.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Management, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Strategy and Management

Strategy and ManagementBusiness, Management and Accounting