Entropy· 2026Q2
Uncertainty-Calibrated Collaborative Filtering via Heteroscedastic Bayesian Neural Networks
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
BayesNCF-v2, a novel Bayesian neural collaborative filtering framework, jointly learns both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, outperforming standard NCF by reducing ECE by 25-73% and NLL by 7-20% across three datasets.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- BayesNCF-v2 jointly models aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in collaborative filtering.
- The framework reduces Expected Calibration Error (ECE) by 25-73% and Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL) by 7-20% compared to standard NCF across three datasets.
- BayesNCF-v2 achieves calibration performance comparable to deep ensembles with significantly fewer parameters.
- Learned aleatoric variance improves calibration for cold-start users.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Although recommendation systems based on neural collaborative filtering (NCF) can achieve high rating accuracy, the point estimates they generate do not express prediction confidence. Existing variants that account for uncertainty, such as Monte Carlo dropout, deep ensemble models, and single-head Bayesian networks, can only capture epistemic uncertainty. We propose BayesNCF-v2, a single-model Bayesian neural collaborative filtering framework that combines a Bayes-by-Backprop output layer with a heteroscedastic head trained under the Gaussian NLL, thereby jointly learning aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. Across five seeds and three datasets, compared to standard NCF, it reduces ECE by 25–73% and NLL by 7–20%, while its calibration performance shows no statistically significant difference from heteroscedastic MC dropout and approaches that of a heteroscedastic deep ensemble consisting of five models, despite having significantly fewer parameters. For cold-start users, the learned aleatoric variance increases, thereby reducing the ECE for cold-start users on three datasets. These results hold consistently across both random and temporal partitions, demonstrating that heteroscedastic aleatoric modeling is the main driver of calibration in these experiments.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Entropy, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Information Systems
Information SystemsComputer Science