PofoliaShared via Pofolia

npj Digital Medicine· 2026Q1

Training and validation of a 12-lead ECG-based deep-learning model for myocardial infarction subtypes

Tobias Zimmermann, Ivo Strebel, Pedro López‐Ayala, Wayne Zeng et al.

Short summary

A deep-learning model accurately identifies myocardial infarction (MI) subtypes from 12-lead ECGs, achieving an AUROC of 0.96 for STEMI detection, surpassing physician performance (0.89).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Deep-learning model trained on 173,396 ECGs for AMI subtype detection.
  • Achieved AUROC of 0.81 for NSTEMI and 0.96 for STEMI.
  • Outperformed physician interpretation for STEMI (0.96 vs. 0.89 AUROC, p < 0.001).
  • Performance was better in younger patients without prior heart disease.
  • Model frequently missed NSTEMI-Occlusion MI cases.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract A convolutional neural network was developed to detect acute myocardial infarction (AMI) subtypes from digital 12-lead ECGs. Trained on 173,396 hospitalized patients’ ECGs, the model underwent fine-tuning and internal validation in 7591 patients and external validation in 4370 patients with suspected AMI. Both prospective validation studies employed central diagnostic adjudication. For non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI), the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.81 [95%-confidence interval (CI) 0.79–0.83], with NSTEMI type 1 at 0.82 [0.80–0.84] versus type 2 at 0.75 [0.71–0.79]. Performance was superior in younger patients without prior heart disease. For ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), the model outperformed physician interpretation (AUROC 0.96 [95%-CI 0.94–0.98] vs. 0.89 [0.85–0.93], p < 0.001). Occlusion MI detection reached AUROC 0.91 [95%-CI 0.89–0.93], though NSTEMI-OMI cases were frequently missed. Overall calibration was good for all MI subtypes. This ECG-based deep learning model demonstrates good discrimination and calibration across AMI subtypes, indicating potential clinical utility for rapid risk stratification and early cardiology intervention.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. npj Digital Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineMedicine