PofoliaShared via Pofolia

IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation· 2013Q1

An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part II: Handling Constraints and Extending to an Adaptive Approach

Himanshu Jain, Kalyanmoy Deb

Short summary

A novel extension of the NSGA-III algorithm effectively handles constrained many-objective optimization problems, outperforming MOEA/D, and an adaptive version improves Pareto-optimal front representation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • NSGA-III is extended to solve constrained many-objective optimization problems.
  • Three new types of scalable constrained test problems are proposed.
  • Constrained NSGA-III shows an edge over constrained MOEA/D, particularly with many objectives.
  • An adaptive NSGA-III variant improves Pareto-optimal front density by updating reference points on the fly.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

In the precursor paper, a many-objective optimization method (NSGA-III), based on the NSGA-II framework, was suggested and applied to a number of unconstrained test and practical problems with box constraints alone. In this paper, we extend NSGA-III to solve generic constrained many-objective optimization problems. In the process, we also suggest three types of constrained test problems that are scalable to any number of objectives and provide different types of challenges to a many-objective optimizer. A previously suggested MOEA/D algorithm is also extended to solve constrained problems. Results using constrained NSGA-III and constrained MOEA/D show an edge of the former, particularly in solving problems with a large number of objectives. Furthermore, the NSGA-III algorithm is made adaptive in updating and including new reference points on the fly. The resulting adaptive NSGA-III is shown to provide a denser representation of the Pareto-optimal front, compared to the original NSGA-III with an identical computational effort. This, and the original NSGA-III paper, together suggest and amply test a viable evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm for handling constrained and unconstrained problems. These studies should encourage researchers to use and pay further attention in evolutionary many-objective optimization.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Computational Theory and Mathematics

Computational Theory and MathematicsComputer Science