BMJ· 2026Q1
New York state resistance to federal regression of sexual and reproductive rights
- 3citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
New York State's experience demonstrates the potential and limitations of state-level resistance against federal restrictions on sexual and reproductive rights.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Federal restrictions on sexual and reproductive rights have expanded through judicial, legislative, legal, and fiscal means.
- New York State's experience is analyzed as a case study of state-level resistance.
- The study illustrates both the potential effectiveness and the inherent limitations of state-level actions in this context.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
As anti-rights actors have consolidated political power in the US, restrictions on sexual and reproductive health and rights have expanded through judicial, legislative, legal, and fiscal mechanisms. Greene and colleagues examine how New York’s experience illustrates both the potential and the limits of state level resistance
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMJ, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthMedicine