International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education· 2019Q1· Review
Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?
- 5,533citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2019year
Short summary
A systematic review of 146 AI in Education (AIEd) studies from 2007-2018 reveals a strong focus on Computer Science/STEM disciplines and quantitative methods, with limited critical reflection on pedagogical integration and ethical considerations.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 146 AIEd studies (2007-2018) were reviewed.
- Research is heavily concentrated in Computer Science and STEM disciplines.
- Quantitative methods are the most common research approach.
- Four main AIEd application areas identified: profiling, assessment, adaptive systems, and tutoring.
- Critical reflection on pedagogical integration and ethical risks is largely absent.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract According to various international reports, Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) is one of the currently emerging fields in educational technology. Whilst it has been around for about 30 years, it is still unclear for educators how to make pedagogical advantage of it on a broader scale, and how it can actually impact meaningfully on teaching and learning in higher education. This paper seeks to provide an overview of research on AI applications in higher education through a systematic review. Out of 2656 initially identified publications for the period between 2007 and 2018, 146 articles were included for final synthesis, according to explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. The descriptive results show that most of the disciplines involved in AIEd papers come from Computer Science and STEM, and that quantitative methods were the most frequently used in empirical studies. The synthesis of results presents four areas of AIEd applications in academic support services, and institutional and administrative services: 1. profiling and prediction, 2. assessment and evaluation, 3. adaptive systems and personalisation, and 4. intelligent tutoring systems. The conclusions reflect on the almost lack of critical reflection of challenges and risks of AIEd, the weak connection to theoretical pedagogical perspectives, and the need for further exploration of ethical and educational approaches in the application of AIEd in higher education.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2019 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Computer Science Applications
Computer Science ApplicationsComputer Science