PofoliaShared via Pofolia

British Journal of Ophthalmology· 2026Q1

Gas tamponade choice in low-to-moderate complexity primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: propensity-matched comparisons of SF 6 , C 2 F 6 and C 3 F 8

Nikolaos Tzoumas, Xiaoman S. Li, David Yorston, Tom H. Williamson et al.

Short summary

Perfluoroethane (C2F6) gas tamponade may offer superior anatomical success and similar visual outcomes compared to SF6 and C3F8 in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair, with C3F8 associated with worse visual acuity and higher complication risks.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • C2F6 showed a trend towards superior anatomical success in RRD repair compared to SF6 (OR 1.19) and a significant advantage over C3F8 (OR 1.28).
  • Postoperative visual acuity was similar between C2F6 and SF6 (MD -0.01 logMAR), but worse with C3F8 compared to both (MD 0.10 logMAR worse than C2F6, 0.09 logMAR worse than SF6).
  • C3F8 was associated with a higher risk of cystoid macular oedema (CMO) than SF6 (OR 2.72) and raised intraocular pressure (IOP) than C2F6 (OR 0.41).
  • No clear anatomical advantage was found for C3F8 over SF6.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Aims To compare single-operation anatomical success, postoperative visual acuity, and complications after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair using sulphur hexafluoride (SF 6 ), perfluoroethane (C 2 F 6 ), or perfluoropropane (C 3 F 8 ). Methods We analysed British and Eire Association of Vitreoretinal Surgeons—European Society of Retina Specialists (BEAVRS–EURETINA) registry data from 2012 to 2024. After exclusions, 7466 eyes contributed to anatomical and 5734 to visual analyses. Intraocular gas tamponades were compared using propensity-score matching and weighted regression adjustment. Equivalence was tested using prespecified margins of OR 0.80–1.25 for anatomical success and ±0.10 logMAR for postoperative visual acuity. Results Matched main-outcome cohorts had effective sample sizes up to 4155. For single-operation anatomical success, estimates favoured C 2 F 6 over SF 6 (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.48; p=0.10), and C 2 F 6 over C 3 F 8 (OR 1.28; 1.01 to 1.65; p=0.048), although the CIs included effects close to the null. C 3 F 8 showed no anatomical advantage over SF 6 (OR 0.83; 0.58 to 1.13; p=0.35), with CIs compatible with possible harm. For postoperative visual acuity, C 2 F 6 and SF 6 were similar (MD −0.01 logMAR; −0.04 to 0.01; p=0.29), while C 3 F 8 was associated with worse acuity than C 2 F 6 (MD 0.10 logMAR worse; 0.07 to 0.14; p<0.001) and SF 6 (MD 0.09 logMAR worse; 0.04 to 0.13; p<0.001). Cystoid macular oedema (CMO) was more common with C 3 F 8 than SF 6 (OR 2.72; 1.13 to 6.57; p=0.026), while raised IOP was less likely with C 2 F 6 than C 3 F 8 (OR 0.41; 0.24 to 0.68; p<0.001). Conclusions In matched low-to-moderate complexity RRD cohorts, C 2 F 6 and SF 6 were associated with similar postoperative visual acuity. C 3 F 8 was associated with worse postoperative visual acuity compared to both other gases, as well as increased risks of CMO compared to SF 6 and of raised IOP compared to C 2 F 6 . Anatomical estimates were consistent with a possible benefit for C 2 F 6 over the other gases, and indicated no clear advantage for C 3 F 8 .

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingMedicine