PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Learning Health Systems· 2026Q1

Promising Patient‐Engagement Practices Used by National Research Networks at the US Veterans Health Administration: Perspectives of Veterans, Staff, and Research Leaders

Tracy L. Sides, Jennifer P. Wisdom, Malloree M. Argust, Erin C. Amundson et al.

Short summary

Veterans, VA engagement staff, and research leaders consistently endorsed 66% (29/44) of promising Veteran-engagement practices identified in VA research networks, forming five recommended engagement responsibilities.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 66% (29/44) of promising Veteran-engagement practices in VA research networks were consistently endorsed by Veterans, engagement staff, and research leaders.
  • Endorsed practices formed five recommended engagement-related responsibilities for VA research networks.
  • Inconsistently endorsed practices (30%) varied by panel and reflected themes of resource constraints, respectful engagement, and partner burden.
  • Developing and sustaining patient-engagement infrastructure requires dedicated planning time, skilled staff, and funding.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Active involvement of patients is an essential feature of learning health systems and patient‐centered research. Research networks and healthcare organizations lack guidance on best practices for developing and sustaining patient engagement infrastructure. We sought to examine perspectives on promising Veteran‐engagement infrastructure and practices used by US Veterans Affairs (VA) research networks. Methods We solicited expert opinion from three separate panels of Veterans, VA engagement staff, and VA research leaders using a modified Delphi process comprising two rounds of online surveys and a set of virtual group meetings or individual interviews. In a prior study, we identified promising engagement practices in use by VA national research networks. We analyzed survey data with predefined rating categories to determine which practices the three expert panels consistently endorsed. We used thematic analysis to compare experts' perspectives across panels and to identify emergent cross‐cutting themes. Results Veterans, VA engagement staff, and VA research leaders consistently endorsed 66% (29/44) of the research networks' promising Veteran‐engagement practices. Summarized, these practices formed five recommended engagement‐related responsibilities for VA research networks. Some network engagement practices were inconsistently endorsed (13/44, 30%), and two practices (4%) received overall ratings of neutral or unsure by at least one expert panel. Network practices not consistently endorsed varied by expert panel, but panelists' comments reflected three overarching themes: constraint of resource availability, commitment to respectful and meaningful engagement processes, and concern for potential burden on partners. Conclusions Panelists' perspectives highlight challenges regarding how to best invest limited patient‐engagement resources within research and learning health system organizations. Research network engagement infrastructure can help expand the capacity and culture of patient‐centered research and care. Organizations seeking to function as learning health systems need to devote planning time, skilled staff, and funds to develop and sustain patient‐engagement infrastructure tailored to their context.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Learning Health Systems, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: General Health Professions

General Health ProfessionsHealth Professions