PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling· 2026Q1

Measuring AI Progress in Drug Discovery: A Reproducible Leaderboard for the Tox21 Challenge

Antonia Ebner, Christoph Bartmann, Sonja Topf, Günter Klambauer et al.

Short summary

A new reproducible leaderboard using the original Tox21 Challenge data set reveals that top-performing AI models for toxicity prediction have not significantly advanced since 2015-2017, questioning the extent of progress in the field.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A reproducible leaderboard for the Tox21 Challenge data set has been created to assess AI progress in drug discovery.
  • The leaderboard uses the original Tox21 data, addressing comparability issues from previous benchmark integrations.
  • Top-performing AI models from 2015 (DeepTox) and 2017 (self-normalizing neural networks) remain competitive for toxicity prediction.
  • Public access to baseline and evaluated models is provided via standardized API endpoints on Hugging Face Spaces.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Deep learning has fundamentally transformed fields such as computer vision and natural language processing since the early 2010s and has strongly influenced biomedical research. For drug discovery specifically, a key inflection point─akin to vision’s “ImageNet moment”─arrived in 2015, when deep neural networks surpassed traditional approaches in the Tox21 Data Challenge. This milestone accelerated the adoption of deep learning methods across the pharmaceutical industry, and today, most major companies have integrated these approaches into their research pipelines. Following the conclusion of the Tox21 Challenge, its data set was incorporated into several established benchmarks, including MoleculeNet and the Open Graph Benchmark. However, during these integrations, the data set was altered, and labels were imputed or manufactured, resulting in a loss of comparability across studies. Consequently, the extent to which bioactivity and toxicity prediction methods have improved over the past decade remains unclear. To this end, we introduce a reproducible leaderboard, hosted on Hugging Face with the original Tox21 Challenge data set, together with a set of baseline and representative methods. The current version of the leaderboard indicates that the original Tox21 winner from 2015─the ensemble-based DeepTox method─and the descriptor-based self-normalizing neural networks introduced in 2017 continue to perform competitively and rank among the top methods for toxicity prediction, raising questions about the extent of progress achieved over the past decade. As part of this work, we provide public access to all baselines and evaluated models for inference via standardized API end points on Hugging Face Spaces.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Computational Theory and Mathematics

Computational Theory and MathematicsComputer Science