PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Research & Politics· 2015Q1

“Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents

Connor Huff, Dustin Tingley

Short summary

MTurk survey respondents are demographically and politically distinct from the general US population, with a younger, more educated, and more liberal profile compared to the Cooperative Congressional Election Survey (CCES).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • MTurk respondents are demographically different from the general US population.
  • MTurk respondents exhibit more liberal political preferences than CCES participants.
  • The study provides a benchmark comparison using the Cooperative Congressional Election Survey (CCES).
  • Researchers can strategically use MTurk to target specific respondent characteristics.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

As Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) has surged in popularity throughout political science, scholars have increasingly challenged the external validity of inferences made drawing upon MTurk samples. At workshops and conferences experimental and survey-based researchers hear questions about the demographic characteristics, political preferences, occupation, and geographic location of MTurk respondents. In this paper we answer these questions and present a number of novel results. By introducing a new benchmark comparison for MTurk surveys, the Cooperative Congressional Election Survey, we compare the joint distributions of age, gender, and race among MTurk respondents within the United States. In addition, we compare political, occupational, and geographical information about respondents from MTurk and CCES. Throughout the paper we show several ways that political scientists can use the strengths of MTurk to attract respondents with specific characteristics of interest to best answer their substantive research questions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Research & Politics, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Computer Science Applications

Computer Science ApplicationsComputer Science