PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Hydrology· 2026Q1

Spatial Variability and Magnitude of Soil Erosion in Vineyards Across Spain: Insights from Standardized ISUM Measurements

Jesús Rodrigo‐Comino, Antonio Jódar-Abellán, Alejandro José Florido Tomé, Manuel López‐Vicente et al.

Short summary

Standardized ISUM measurements across 13 Spanish vineyards reveal soil mobilization rates varying from -103.3 to +17.9 t ha−1 yr−1, with young vineyards on limestone and marls showing the highest net losses.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Standardized ISUM measurements were used across 13 Spanish vineyards with varying conditions.
  • Soil mobilization rates ranged from -103.3 t ha−1 yr−1 (young vineyard on limestone) to +17.9 t ha−1 yr−1 (older/stable vineyards).
  • Vineyard age and parent material were identified as significant factors affecting erosion magnitude.
  • ISUM measurements provided spatial maps of erosion and deposition without interpolation, showing marked differences within vineyards.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Soil erosion and sediment redistribution in vineyards often exceed tolerable thresholds, but comparative field measurements across regions remain limited because studies use different methods and sampling designs. This study assesses soil redistribution in vineyards using a common field-based approach. Thirteen vineyard sites across Spain, covering contrasting climates, parent materials, soil types, management conditions, and vineyard ages (2–40 years), were surveyed using the Improved Stock Unearthing Method (ISUM). Soil surface changes were measured along systematic transects and combined with site-specific bulk density and vineyard age to estimate soil mobilization rates in t ha−1 yr−1. Measured surface changes ranged from −28 to +19 cm, while soil mobilization rates varied considerably among sites. The highest net soil losses were recorded in a young vineyard developed on limestone (−103.3 t ha−1 yr−1) and in a vineyard on marls (−87.7 t ha−1 yr−1). Other sites showed moderate net erosion (−3.9 to −15.4 t ha−1 yr−1), whereas positive balances (+7.2 to +17.9 t ha−1 yr−1) were observed in some older or more stable vineyards. Differences among sites suggest that vineyard age and parent material are relevant factors when interpreting erosion magnitude, while management conditions may contribute to the spatial variability of soil redistribution. Spatial maps based directly on ISUM measurements showed marked differences between erosion and deposition areas within individual vineyards, without the use of spatial interpolation. Applying the same ISUM protocol across contrasting vineyard conditions allowed soil redistribution patterns to be compared using a consistent field procedure. The results also showed the large variability that can occur among vineyard systems.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Hydrology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Soil Science

Soil ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences