Machines· 2026Q2· Review
Digital Intelligence-Enabled Green Scheduling in Dynamic Job Shops: A Review
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
This review identifies a shift in dynamic job shop scheduling from static, efficiency-focused methods to adaptive, multi-objective approaches integrating digital intelligence for energy and carbon reduction.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Dynamic job shops require scheduling that adapts to real-time changes and energy/carbon constraints.
- Emerging literature shows a move from static to adaptive scheduling, integrating digital intelligence.
- Scheduling objectives are expanding from efficiency to include coordinated energy and carbon goals.
- Current research shows weak data-model coupling, limited transferability, and rare closed-loop industrial validation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Dynamic job shops must absorb new orders, machine failures and processing time variations while operating under increasingly demanding energy and carbon constraints. In such settings, an offline schedule may become obsolete soon after release, especially when production and energy states evolve on different time scales. Digital twins, data-driven models and artificial intelligence methods now make it possible to sense shop floor changes, anticipate their effects and revise schedules through feedback. This review organises the emerging literature through a ‘four loops and one layer’ framework: perception, modelling and prediction, intelligent decision-making, and execution feedback form the operating cycle, while continuous learning spans successive scheduling rounds. Studies are examined along three distinct but related dimensions—dynamic events, green objectives and digital intelligence methods. Within this D-G-I framework, the literature reveals a move from static optimisation to adaptive scheduling, from efficiency-centred formulations to coordinated efficiency–energy–carbon objectives, and from stand-alone rules towards combinations of data, models and domain knowledge. Yet the evidence remains uneven. Data–model coupling is often weak, transfer across production settings is limited, and genuinely closed-loop industrial validation is rare. These limitations make explainable decision-making, cross-scenario adaptation and digital twin-enabled closed-loop optimisation central priorities for subsequent research.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Machines, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing EngineeringEngineering