PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique· 2026Q2

Legal Realities of Time Travel: Lessons from Popular Culture

Mirosław Michał Sadowski, Alexander Simmonds

Short summary

This paper uses popular culture examples like 'The Terminator' and 'Back to the Future' to explore potential legal issues arising from time travel technology, including human rights and criminal liability.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Popular culture narratives offer a framework for anticipating legal issues related to time travel.
  • Key legal questions include the status of time travelers and jurisdiction for past crimes.
  • Altering history raises complex ethical and legal dilemmas concerning human rights and individual existence.
  • The paper analyzes specific fictional works including 'Time Machine,' 'The Terminator,' and 'Back to the Future.'

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract What could the invention of time travel technology uncover about the law’s nature? Embracing the technological considerations, this paper prepares to anticipate legal issues surrounding time travel, using popular culture imaginaries as a source of potential challenges. Following the introduction, in which the authors explain the scope of the paper, the specific law and popular culture methodology, and the selection of the cultural texts, the first part of the paper specifically engages with the latter. Thus, following an overview of physical and philosophical considerations of time travel, the authors conduct the legal analysis of H. G. Wells’ ‘Time Machine’, movie series ‘The Terminator’ and ‘Back to the Future’, two series of Disney comic books focusing on time travel, and TV series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’ and ‘Timeless’. Next, the second part of the paper focuses on the legal theoretical issues surrounding time travel and the repercussions of altering the course of history, ranging from the question of the respect for human rights in distant past or a dystopian future to the elimination of certain individuals from history (the ‘killing Hitler’ debate). The third part of the article will consider equally the practical and procedural dimensions. If an individual were to travel back in time to a date preceding their birth, then what exactly would be their legal status? Further to this, should a time traveller commit a crime during their voyage into the past, under which set of laws would criminal liability arise? Ultimately, in the conclusion, the authors ponder the conceptualisation of rules for time travel activities.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Law

LawSocial Sciences