Computers· 2026Q1· Review
Deep Learning Approaches for Phishing Detection: A Systematic Review with a Focus on Mobile Deployment, Explainability, and Temporal Modelling
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Deep learning models, particularly transformer-based, hybrid, and attention-enhanced architectures, achieve over 97% accuracy in phishing detection, with lightweight designs enabling mobile deployment.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Deep learning models, including transformer, hybrid, and attention-enhanced architectures, demonstrate high accuracy (over 97%) in phishing detection.
- Lightweight and edge-oriented deep learning architectures facilitate deployment on resource-constrained mobile environments.
- There is a growing trend towards combining Explainable AI (XAI) and temporal sequence modeling for enhanced detection transparency and robustness.
- Comparisons across studies are challenging due to inconsistencies in datasets, feature representation, evaluation protocols, and performance metrics.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Financial loss, data theft, and user harm can result from phishing attacks, which are increasing in frequency and variety beyond traditional email-based attacks to include mobile forms like smishing, quishing, malicious mobile applications, and mobile phishing websites. While a number of reviews have already addressed phishing, Android Mal-Ware, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), the literature is still disjointed in the lightweight deployment, model explainability, temporal attack behaviour, coordinated phishing detection, and evaluation datasets of intelligent mobile systems. The purpose of this systematic literature review (SLR) is to analyse all the major phishing detection methods using deep learning published from 2020 to 2026 and to focus on the key features of these methods, such as the model architectures, the mobile deployment, the explainability, the temporal modelling, coordinated detection, and the evaluation datasets. Studies were identified, screened, and assessed for eligibility using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines before being included in the review for qualitative synthesis. Out of 101 studies that were included in the final review, the evidence was comparatively synthesised considering the following: learning architecture, detection modality, deployment characteristics, explainability mechanisms, the ability to model time, and the evaluation performance reported. The synthesis results show that phishing detection is generally good, with the accuracy of the transformer-based, hybrid, and attention-enhanced architectures being above 97% for some of the selected studies, and lightweight and edge-oriented architectures making the deployment more feasible for resource-constrained mobile environments. The reviewed evidence also demonstrates the increasing combination of XAI, temporal sequence modelling and multimodal analysis to enhance the transparency and robustness of detection. Comparisons between studies are, however, restricted by variations in the datasets, the representation of the features, the evaluation protocols, and the performance metrics. The results highlight the importance of future research focused on explaining lightweight, temporally adaptive, and robust phishing detection frameworks for intelligent mobile systems.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Computers, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Information Systems
Information SystemsComputer Science