IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing· 2014Q1
On Training Targets for Supervised Speech Separation
- 1,123citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2014year
Short summary
Supervised speech separation models trained with ideal ratio mask (IRM) or FFT-MASK targets outperform those using ideal binary mask (IBM) or spectral envelope targets, showing improved objective intelligibility and quality metrics.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Ratio mask targets (IRM, FFT-MASK) yield better speech separation performance than binary mask (IBM) or spectral envelope targets.
- IRM and FFT-MASK targets improve objective intelligibility and quality metrics in various test conditions.
- Masking-based targets are generally superior to spectral envelope-based targets for supervised speech separation.
- Supervised speech separation methods outperform non-negative matrix factorization and traditional speech enhancement.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Formulation of speech separation as a supervised learning problem has shown considerable promise. In its simplest form, a supervised learning algorithm, typically a deep neural network, is trained to learn a mapping from noisy features to a time-frequency representation of the target of interest. Traditionally, the ideal binary mask (IBM) is used as the target because of its simplicity and large speech intelligibility gains. The supervised learning framework, however, is not restricted to the use of binary targets. In this study, we evaluate and compare separation results by using different training targets, including the IBM, the target binary mask, the ideal ratio mask (IRM), the short-time Fourier transform spectral magnitude and its corresponding mask (FFT-MASK), and the Gammatone frequency power spectrum. Our results in various test conditions reveal that the two ratio mask targets, the IRM and the FFT-MASK, outperform the other targets in terms of objective intelligibility and quality metrics. In addition, we find that masking based targets, in general, are significantly better than spectral envelope based targets. We also present comparisons with recent methods in non-negative matrix factorization and speech enhancement, which show clear performance advantages of supervised speech separation.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing, 2014 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Signal Processing
Signal ProcessingComputer Science