PofoliaShared via Pofolia

IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security· 2015Q1

Face Spoof Detection With Image Distortion Analysis

Di Wen, Hu Han, Anil K. Jain

Short summary

A novel face spoof detection algorithm (IDA) uses four image distortion features (specular reflection, blurriness, chromatic moment, color diversity) and an ensemble of SVM classifiers to outperform state-of-the-art methods on public and custom databases.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Proposes an Image Distortion Analysis (IDA) algorithm for face spoof detection.
  • Extracts four features: specular reflection, blurriness, chromatic moment, and color diversity.
  • Utilizes an ensemble of SVM classifiers trained for specific spoof attacks.
  • Achieves superior performance compared to state-of-the-art methods on multiple databases.
  • Highlights difficulties in cross-database and cross-device spoof detection.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Automatic face recognition is now widely used in applications ranging from deduplication of identity to authentication of mobile payment. This popularity of face recognition has raised concerns about face spoof attacks (also known as biometric sensor presentation attacks), where a photo or video of an authorized person's face could be used to gain access to facilities or services. While a number of face spoof detection techniques have been proposed, their generalization ability has not been adequately addressed. We propose an efficient and rather robust face spoof detection algorithm based on image distortion analysis (IDA). Four different features (specular reflection, blurriness, chromatic moment, and color diversity) are extracted to form the IDA feature vector. An ensemble classifier, consisting of multiple SVM classifiers trained for different face spoof attacks (e.g., printed photo and replayed video), is used to distinguish between genuine (live) and spoof faces. The proposed approach is extended to multiframe face spoof detection in videos using a voting-based scheme. We also collect a face spoof database, MSU mobile face spoofing database (MSU MFSD), using two mobile devices (Google Nexus 5 and MacBook Air) with three types of spoof attacks (printed photo, replayed video with iPhone 5S, and replayed video with iPad Air). Experimental results on two public-domain face spoof databases (Idiap REPLAY-ATTACK and CASIA FASD), and the MSU MFSD database show that the proposed approach outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in spoof detection. Our results also highlight the difficulty in separating genuine and spoof faces, especially in cross-database and cross-device scenarios.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Signal Processing

Signal ProcessingComputer Science