Psychological Methods· 2012Q1
Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory.
- 1,552citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2012year
Short summary
A new Bayesian approach to structural equation modeling (SEM) replaces exact zero constraints with small-variance priors, allowing for more flexible representation of theories and handling of non-identified models.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Proposes a Bayesian approach for SEM using informative, small-variance priors instead of exact zero constraints.
- This method allows for a more flexible representation of substantive theories in statistical models.
- The Bayesian approach handles non-identified models that arise when adding parameters to conventional SEM.
- Demonstrates applications in confirmatory factor analysis (cross-loadings, residual correlations) and full SEM misspecification.
- Integrates model testing (posterior predictive checking), estimation, and modification within the Bayesian framework.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This article proposes a new approach to factor analysis and structural equation modeling using Bayesian analysis. The new approach replaces parameter specifications of exact zeros with approximate zeros based on informative, small-variance priors. It is argued that this produces an analysis that better reflects substantive theories. The proposed Bayesian approach is particularly beneficial in applications where parameters are added to a conventional model such that a nonidentified model is obtained if maximum-likelihood estimation is applied. This approach is useful for measurement aspects of latent variable modeling, such as with confirmatory factor analysis, and the measurement part of structural equation modeling. Two application areas are studied, cross-loadings and residual correlations in confirmatory factor analysis. An example using a full structural equation model is also presented, showing an efficient way to find model misspecification. The approach encompasses 3 elements: model testing using posterior predictive checking, model estimation, and model modification. Monte Carlo simulations and real data are analyzed using Mplus. The real-data analyses use data from Holzinger and Swineford's (1939) classic mental abilities study, Big Five personality factor data from a British survey, and science achievement data from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Psychological Methods, 2012 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Management Science and Operations Research
Management Science and Operations ResearchDecision Sciences