PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Geomechanics· 2026Q1

Influence of Footing Geometry on the Behavior of Floating Stone Columns in Soft Clay

Nibir Rahman, Md. Rokonuzzaman, Toshinori Sakai, Ashiqur Rahman

Short summary

Increasing the area replacement ratio of footings on floating stone column (FSC)-improved soft clay substantially improves bearing capacity, while increasing footing length-to-width ratio reduces it by up to 7% at lower area ratios.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Increasing the area replacement ratio of footings on FSC-improved ground substantially improves bearing capacity.
  • Increasing footing length-to-width ratio reduces bearing capacity by up to 7% at lower area ratios and 3% at higher area ratios.
  • A critical footing length-to-width ratio (L/D) of 6.67 marks a transition from punching-dominated to bulging-dominated failure.
  • Square footings create a deeper triangular failure zone, while rectangular footings create a shallower trapezoidal zone, reducing bearing capacity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Stone columns are commonly used to improve the bearing capacity and reduce the settlement of soft cohesive soils; however, the effects of footing shape and area replacement ratio on the floating stone column (FSC)–improved ground remain unclear. Short-term field load tests were conducted at Misono-cho, Suzuka City, Mie Prefecture, Japan, for footings with area ratios varying from 0.14 to 0.56 and footing length-to-width ratios up to 4. A three-dimensional finite-element model (FEM) was calibrated and validated against field measurements, showing good agreement with observed stress–settlement responses. The results indicate that increasing the area replacement ratio substantially improves the bearing capacity. Increasing the footing length-to-width ratio reduces the bearing capacity up to 7% at lower area ratios, while the reduction was limited to 3% at higher area ratios. The shear strain response obtained from the FEM analysis indicated a transition from punching-dominated behavior to bulging-dominated failure at a critical L / D of 6.67. Square footings produced a triangular failure zone with a larger influence depth, while rectangular footings caused a trapezoidal zone with a smaller, nearly uniform influence depth, resulting in reduced bearing capacity. Using the equivalent homogeneous composite ground approach, bearing capacity and shape factor equations were developed and compared with published studies for validation. The findings highlight the significant influence of footing geometry on the stress distribution, influence depth, and failure mechanism of FSC-improved ground.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Civil and Structural Engineering

Civil and Structural EngineeringEngineering