TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCES· 2018Q2
Prediction of gross calorific value of coal based on proximate analysis using multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks
- 35citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2018year
Short summary
Radial Basis Function Neural Networks (RBFNN) achieved high performance in predicting coal's gross calorific value (GCV) from proximate analysis data, outperforming other neural networks and multiple linear regression.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Developed 11 prediction models for coal's GCV using proximate analysis variables.
- Applied Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and various Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) including GRNN and RBFNN.
- Utilized a single dataset with the maximum number of coal samples for GCV prediction.
- Moisture and ash content were identified as the most significant predictors of GCV.
- RBFNN models achieved the highest prediction performance, followed by GRNN, MLP, and MLR.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Gross calorific value (GCV) of coal was predicted by using as-received basis proximate analysis data. Two main objectives of the study were to develop prediction models for GCV using proximate analysis variables and to reveal the distinct predictors of GCV. Multiple linear regression (MLR) and artifcial neural network (ANN) (multilayer perceptron MLP, general regression neural network GRNN, and radial basis function neural network RBFNN) methods were applied to the developed 11 models created by different combinations of the predictor variables. By conducting 10-fold cross-validation, the prediction accuracy of the models has been tested by using $ R^2 $, $ RMSE $, $ MAE $, and $ MAPE $. In this study, for the first time in the literature, for a single dataset, maximum number of coal samples were utilized and GRNN and RBFNN methods were used in GCV prediction based on proximate analysis. The results showed that moisture and ash are the most discriminative predictors of GCV and the developed RBFNN-based models produce high performance for GCV prediction. Additionally, performances of the regression methods, from the best to the worst, were RBFNN, GRNN, MLP, and MLR.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Fuel Technology
Fuel TechnologyEnergy