PLOS mental health.· 2026Q2
Who you are or what you have: Historical trends in identity-first and person-first language in books and news media
- 1citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Person-first language (e.g., "person with autism") saw a rise from 1980, but identity-first language (e.g., "autistic person") has recently surged, creating a curvilinear trend in books and news media.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Person-first language use increased from 1980 onwards.
- Identity-first language use has recently accelerated, reversing the earlier trend.
- The overall trend shows a curvilinear pattern for both language types.
- Identity-first language is more common in singular contexts (e.g., 'autistic person') than plural (e.g., 'autistic people').
- Preferences and trends vary significantly across different conditions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Whether people experiencing mental ill health or disability should be referred to using person-first (e.g., “person with autism”) or identity-first (e.g., “autistic person”) terminology is an ongoing subject of debate. The present study conducted the most comprehensive investigation to date of historical trends in the use of the two kinds of terms, evaluating the frequency of “X person/people” relative to “person/people with X” expressions for a collection of mental health, disability, and other conditions in Google Books (1980–2019) and the News on the Web corpus (2010–2025). Consistent with predictions, person-first language became more popular from 1980 onward, but this trend was counteracted by a more recent swing toward identity-first language, resulting in a curvilinear trend. Identity-first language was also more prevalent in singular than in plural expressions. Beyond these broad trends, there was substantial diversity in terminological preferences and trends across conditions. Implications are discussed.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLOS mental health., 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Cognitive Neuroscience
Cognitive NeuroscienceNeuroscience