PofoliaShared via Pofolia

IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics· 2012Q1· Review

Review of Battery Charger Topologies, Charging Power Levels, and Infrastructure for Plug-In Electric and Hybrid Vehicles

Murat Yılmaz, Philip T. Krein

Short summary

This review categorizes plug-in electric vehicle charger systems into on-board and off-board types, highlighting trade-offs in power, cost, and complexity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Charger systems are classified as on-board or off-board, with unidirectional or bidirectional power flow.
  • On-board chargers face limitations in power due to weight, space, and cost constraints.
  • Off-board chargers offer higher charging rates as they are less constrained by size and weight.
  • Charging power levels range from Level 1 (convenience) to Level 3 (fast charging).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This paper reviews the current status and implementation of battery chargers, charging power levels, and infrastructure for plug-in electric vehicles and hybrids. Charger systems are categorized into off-board and on-board types with unidirectional or bidirectional power flow. Unidirectional charging limits hardware requirements and simplifies interconnection issues. Bidirectional charging supports battery energy injection back to the grid. Typical on-board chargers restrict power because of weight, space, and cost constraints. They can be integrated with the electric drive to avoid these problems. The availability of charging infrastructure reduces on-board energy storage requirements and costs. On-board charger systems can be conductive or inductive. An off-board charger can be designed for high charging rates and is less constrained by size and weight. Level 1 (convenience), Level 2 (primary), and Level 3 (fast) power levels are discussed. Future aspects such as roadbed charging are presented. Various power level chargers and infrastructure configurations are presented, compared, and evaluated based on amount of power, charging time and location, cost, equipment, and other factors.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Automotive Engineering

Automotive EngineeringEngineering