New England Journal of Medicine· 2018Q1
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- 2,402citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2018year
Short summary
In patients with very severe ARDS, venovenous ECMO did not significantly reduce 60-day mortality compared to conventional treatment with ECMO as rescue therapy (35% vs. 46%, P=0.09).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 60-day mortality was 35% in the ECMO group vs. 46% in the control group (relative risk 0.76, P=0.09).
- 35% of control patients crossed over to ECMO, with 57% of those dying.
- ECMO group had more bleeding (46% vs. 28%) and thrombocytopenia (27% vs. 16%).
- ECMO group had fewer ischemic strokes (0% vs. 5%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. METHODS: of less than 80 mm Hg for more than 6 hours; or an arterial blood pH of less than 7.25 with a partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide of at least 60 mm Hg for more than 6 hours - to receive immediate venovenous ECMO (ECMO group) or continued conventional treatment (control group). Crossover to ECMO was possible for patients in the control group who had refractory hypoxemia. The primary end point was mortality at 60 days. RESULTS: At 60 days, 44 of 124 patients (35%) in the ECMO group and 57 of 125 (46%) in the control group had died (relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 1.04; P=0.09). Crossover to ECMO occurred a mean (±SD) of 6.5±9.7 days after randomization in 35 patients (28%) in the control group, with 20 of these patients (57%) dying. The frequency of complications did not differ significantly between groups, except that there were more bleeding events leading to transfusion in the ECMO group than in the control group (in 46% vs. 28% of patients; absolute risk difference, 18 percentage points; 95% CI, 6 to 30) as well as more cases of severe thrombocytopenia (in 27% vs. 16%; absolute risk difference, 11 percentage points; 95% CI, 0 to 21) and fewer cases of ischemic stroke (in no patients vs. 5%; absolute risk difference, -5 percentage points; 95% CI, -10 to -2). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with very severe ARDS, 60-day mortality was not significantly lower with ECMO than with a strategy of conventional mechanical ventilation that included ECMO as rescue therapy. (Funded by the Direction de la Recherche Clinique et du Développement and the French Ministry of Health; EOLIA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01470703 .).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Biomedical Engineering
Biomedical EngineeringEngineering