PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Earthquake Spectra· 2014Q1

Summary of the ASK14 Ground Motion Relation for Active Crustal Regions

Norman Abrahamson, Walter J. Silva, Ronnie Kamai

Short summary

The ASK14 model provides updated ground motion predictions for active crustal regions, applicable for magnitudes 3.0-8.5 and distances 0-300 km, incorporating regional attenuation differences and improved hanging wall effects.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The ASK14 model predicts ground motion for magnitudes 3.0-8.5 and distances 0-300 km.
  • It uses spectral acceleration for nonlinear effects and includes azimuth-dependent hanging wall effects.
  • Regional differences in attenuation and V S 30 scaling are incorporated for California, Japan, China, and Taiwan.
  • The standard deviation of predictions varies with magnitude and spectral period.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Empirical ground motion models for the average horizontal component from shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions are derived using the PEER NGA‐West2 database. The model is applicable to magnitudes 3.0–8.5, distances 0–300 km, and spectral periods of 0–10 s. The model input parameters are the same as those used by Abrahamson and Silva (2008), with the following exceptions: the loading level for nonlinear effects is based on the spectral acceleration at the period of interest rather than the PGA; and the distance scaling for hanging wall (HW) effects off the ends of the rupture includes a dependence on the source‐to‐site azimuth. Regional differences in large‐distance attenuation and V S 30 scaling between California, Japan, China, and Taiwan are included. The scaling for the HW effect is improved using constraints from numerical simulations. The standard deviation is magnitude‐dependent, with smaller magnitudes leading to larger standard deviations at short periods, but smaller standard deviations at long periods. Directivity effects are not included through explicit parameters, but are captured through the variability of the empirical data.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Earthquake Spectra, 2014 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Civil and Structural Engineering

Civil and Structural EngineeringEngineering