PofoliaShared via Pofolia

PLoS ONE· 2026Q1

Classification of daily activities using a wireless instrumented insole (WalkinSense) in a semi free-living setting

Anne Backes, Melanie Eckelt, Jennifer Fayad, Valeria Serchi et al.

Short summary

A wireless insole fusing pressure and inertial data achieved 87% overall accuracy in classifying daily activities in a semi free-living setting (n=99).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The WalkinSense insole achieved 87% overall accuracy and 0.84 Cohen's Kappa for classifying daily activities.
  • Activities like sitting, walking with crutches, and cycling showed excellent classification performance (F1 > 0.90).
  • Level walking, non-level walking, and standing showed good performance (F1 > 0.80).
  • Step count was highly accurate (MAPE < 5%), but stair count accuracy was moderate (MAPE ≈ 26%).
  • Misclassifications primarily occurred between level walking, hill walking, and stairs.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background Accurate monitoring of activities of daily living (ADLs) in real‑world environments is essential for preventive care and rehabilitation, yet it remains difficult to achieve outside controlled laboratory settings. Instrumented insoles provide a promising, unobtrusive solution for continuous monitoring. However, the use of multimodal systems integrating plantar pressure and inertial data in naturalistic conditions and larger cohorts is still limited. This study therefore aims to evaluate the accuracy of a wireless instrumented insole (WalkinSense) that fuses pressure and inertial sensor data to classify ADLs within a semi free-living setting. Methods A total of 99 participants performed a broad set of indoor and outdoor activities. Frame-by-frame performance was compared to ground truth (direct observation) using overall accuracy, Cohen’s Kappa, precision, recall, F1-scores and a normalised confusion matrix. Agreement on total activity duration was assessed using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) scores and Bland-Altman plots. Results Activity classification showed almost perfect agreement (mean overall accuracy 0.87, mean Cohen’s Kappa 0.84). Excellent performance (F1 > 0.90) was achieved for sitting, walking with crutches and cycling, while standing, level and non-level walking showed good performance (F1 > 0.80). Most misclassifications occurred between level walking, hill walking and stairs. Duration-based analysis confirmed high accuracy for sitting, walking with crutches and cycling (MAPE ≤ 10%). Bland-Altman plots indicated overestimation of level walking and underestimation of hill and stair walking. Step count was highly accurate (MAPE < 5%), whereas stair count showed only reasonable accuracy (MAPE ≈ 26%). Conclusion These findings demonstrate the system’s strong potential for real-world monitoring and classification of ADLs while also highlighting the need for improved detection of non-level walking activities.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLoS ONE, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationHealth Professions