PofoliaShared via Pofolia

History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences· 2026Q1

New visual culture of science: analysis of graphical abstracts in the life science journal “Cell”

Kana Ariga

Short summary

Graphical abstracts (GAs) in Cell (2021) frequently feature new graphics (66.7%) and present results/models (88.6%), reflecting a trend towards infographic-like clarity driven by the need for instant comprehension in a competitive scientific environment.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 88.6% of Cell's 2021 graphical abstracts explained results and models.
  • 222 GAs (66.7%) featured new graphics not present in the main text.
  • 251 GAs (75.4%) used a multi-section layout.
  • GAs share commonalities with modern internet infographics, emphasizing clarity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Driven by the shift towards online journal publishing, many academic journals have introduced graphical abstracts (GAs) since the 2000s to convey the primary findings of research papers. This study investigated this visual culture in life sciences by analyzing GAs with focus on content, representation, and background. In total, 333 GAs were collected from articles published in the journal Cell in 2021 and analyzed. Among these, 295 GAs (88.6%) explained the results and models and succinctly presented the key findings, and 251 GAs (75.4%) used a layout that divided the area into two or more sections. New graphics that were not present in the main text were featured in 222 GAs (66.7%), indicating substantial investment in their creation. The GAs shared commonalities with modern infographics commonly seen on the internet, which emphasize clarity. The increased used of GAs may be attributed to the need for “instant comprehension,” which is an epistemic virtue reinforced by authors, readers, and journals and driven by the scientific self of “surviving researchers and journals” in a competitive scientific environment.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: History and Philosophy of Science

History and Philosophy of ScienceArts and Humanities