Pragmatics and Society· 2026Q1
Towards an interdisciplinary definition of pragmatics
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new definition unifies pragmatics as the study of how language users negotiate context-dependent, socially situated meaning through intentional, inferential, and rule-mediated communication.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Analyzed 365 single-sentence definitions of pragmatics from linguistics, philosophy, psychology, sociology, and communication studies (1938-2025).
- Identified five core components: contextual relationality, meaningful usage, cognitive communication, functional action, and social system.
- Proposes a unified definition: pragmatics studies how language users negotiate context-dependent, socially situated meaning through intentional, inferential, and rule-mediated communication.
- Positions pragmatics as an interdisciplinary nexus of cognition, interaction, and culture.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract The definition of pragmatics has long oscillated between two views: as a component of linguistics and as a perspective on language use ( Haberland and Mey 1977 ; Verschueren and Östman 2009 ). The perspective view, now dominant ( Rajagopalan 2009 ), commits the field to interdisciplinary inquiry but leaves its conceptual core unsettled. Within Caffi’s ( 2006 , 2010 ) metapragmatic framework, this study analyzes 365 single-sentence definitions of pragmatics (1938–2025) from linguistics, philosophy, psychology, sociology, and communication studies. Semantic-field coding and frequency analysis identify five shared core components: contextual relationality, meaningful usage, cognitive communication, functional action, and social system. These inform a unified definition: pragmatics is the study of how language users negotiate context-dependent, socially situated meaning through intentional, inferential, and rule-mediated communication. Countering Gazdar’s (1979) reductionism and Bar-Hillel’s (1971) “wastebasket” critique, this framing positions pragmatics as an interdisciplinary nexus of cognition, interaction, and culture.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Pragmatics and Society, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Language and Linguistics
Language and LinguisticsArts and Humanities