PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling· 2026Q1

In-Context Molecular Property Prediction with LLMs: A Blinding Study on Memorization and Knowledge Conflicts

M. Busch, M. Tacke, Sviatlana V. Lamaka, Mikhail L. Zheludkevich et al.

Short summary

Large language models (LLMs) do not appear to memorize molecular property values from legacy benchmarks, but blinding experiments reveal conflicts between their pretrained knowledge and in-context information.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • No evidence of verbatim retrieval of molecular property values from legacy benchmarks by LLMs was found.
  • Progressively blinded experiments revealed conflicts between LLMs' pretrained knowledge and in-context information.
  • Nine LLM variants (GPT-4.1, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5) were tested on three MoleculeNet datasets.
  • A systematic blinding approach and varying in-context sample sizes (0, 60, 1000-shot) controlled information access.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract The capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have expanded beyond natural language processing to scientific prediction tasks, including molecular property prediction. However, their effectiveness in in-context learning remains ambiguous, particularly given the potential for training data contamination in widely used benchmarks. This paper investigates whether LLMs perform genuine in-context regression on molecular properties or instead rely on verbatim retrieval of memorized target values. Furthermore, we analyze the interplay between pretrained knowledge and in-context information through a series of progressively blinded experiments. We evaluate nine LLM variants across three families (GPT-4.1, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5) on three MoleculeNet data sets (Delaney solubility, Lipophilicity, QM7 atomization energy) using a systematic blinding approach that iteratively reduces available information, complemented by 0-, 60-, and 1000-shot in-context sample sizes as an additional control for information access. To validate the memorization analysis and the blinding experiments, we add a positive and a negative control for the memorization experiments and structural reference baselines for the multishot experiments, as well as bootstrap confidence intervals for all results. We find no evidence of verbatim retrieval on the legacy benchmarks and show that blinding exposes conflicts between pretrained knowledge and in-context information. This work provides a principled framework for evaluating molecular property prediction under controlled information access.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Materials Chemistry

Materials ChemistryMaterials Science