International Review of Administrative Sciences· 2015Q1· Review
Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance
- 1,654citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2015year
Short summary
Smart city governance is best understood as a complex process of institutional change, not just a technological issue, requiring new forms of human collaboration via ICTs for better outcomes and open processes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Smart city governance literature varies in its focus on technology, people, or collaboration.
- Publications differ on whether smart city governance is transformative or incremental.
- Legitimacy claims for smart city governance focus on either better outcomes or more open processes.
- A comprehensive perspective defines smart city governance as using ICTs for human collaboration to achieve better outcomes and open processes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Academic attention to smart cities and their governance is growing rapidly, but the fragmentation in approaches makes for a confusing debate. This article brings some structure to the debate by analyzing a corpus of 51 publications and mapping their variation. The analysis shows that publications differ in their emphasis on (1) smart technology, smart people or smart collaboration as the defining features of smart cities, (2) a transformative or incremental perspective on changes in urban governance, (3) better outcomes or a more open process as the legitimacy claim for smart city governance. We argue for a comprehensive perspective: smart city governance is about crafting new forms of human collaboration through the use of ICTs to obtain better outcomes and more open governance processes. Research into smart city governance could benefit from previous studies into success and failure factors for e-government and build upon sophisticated theories of socio-technical change. This article highlights that smart city governance is not a technological issue: we should study smart city governance as a complex process of institutional change and acknowledge the political nature of appealing visions of socio-technical governance. Points for practitioners The study provides practitioners with an in-depth understanding of current debates about smart city governance. The article highlights that governing a smart city is about crafting new forms of human collaboration through the use of information and communication technologies. City managers should realize that technology by itself will not make a city smarter: building a smart city requires a political understanding of technology, a process approach to manage the emerging smart city and a focus on both economic gains and other public values.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2015 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Media Technology
Media TechnologyEngineering