PofoliaShared via Pofolia

IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing· 2020Q1· Review

Support Vector Machine Versus Random Forest for Remote Sensing Image Classification: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Mohammadreza Sheykhmousa, Masoud Mahdianpari, Hamid Ghanbari, Fariba Mohammadimanesh et al.

Short summary

A meta-analysis of 251 papers reveals Random Forest (RF) outperforms Support Vector Machines (SVM) in remote sensing image classification across various data types, spatial resolutions, and feature extraction methods.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Random Forest (RF) generally outperforms Support Vector Machines (SVM) in remote sensing image classification.
  • RF's superior performance is observed across various data types, remote sensing applications, spatial resolutions, and feature extraction strategies.
  • The meta-analysis is based on a comprehensive database constructed from 251 peer-reviewed journal papers.
  • The study discusses challenges, recommendations, and future research directions in remote sensing image classification.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Several machine-learning algorithms have been proposed for remote sensing image classification during the past two decades. Among these machine learning algorithms, Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) have drawn attention to image classification in several remote sensing applications. This article reviews RF and SVM concepts relevant to remote sensing image classification and applies a meta-analysis of 251 peer-reviewed journal papers. A database with more than 40 quantitative and qualitative fields was constructed from these reviewed papers. The meta-analysis mainly focuses on 1) the analysis regarding the general characteristics of the studies, such as geographical distribution, frequency of the papers considering time, journals, application domains, and remote sensing software packages used in the case studies, and 2) a comparative analysis regarding the performances of RF and SVM classification against various parameters, such as data type, RS applications, spatial resolution, and the number of extracted features in the feature engineering step. The challenges, recommendations, and potential directions for future research are also discussed in detail. Moreover, a summary of the results is provided to aid researchers to customize their efforts in order to achieve the most accurate results based on their thematic applications.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2020 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Media Technology

Media TechnologyEngineering