PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Agronomy· 2026Q1

Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield, Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Spring Maize and Farmland Ecological Environment in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China

Yu Zheng, Yue Zhao, Shuangquan Liu, Xingzhu Ma et al.

Short summary

A two-year field experiment in Northeast China's black soil region found that a medium nitrogen application rate (180 kg N ha−1) best balances spring maize yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and environmental impact, outperforming low and high rates.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Medium nitrogen application (180 kg N ha−1) maximized spring maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency in Northeast China's black soil region.
  • Compared to high nitrogen rates, the medium rate increased yield by 4.1% and nitrogen recovery efficiency by 26.8%.
  • The medium rate significantly reduced environmental risks, decreasing apparent N loss by 47.8% and greenhouse gas emissions (N2O, CO2) by 25.5% and 23.1% respectively, compared to the high rate.
  • Low nitrogen rates (120 kg N ha−1) failed to meet high-yield targets, while high rates increased environmental risks despite marginal yield gains.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The black soil region of Northeast China is a major grain-producing area, where excessive nitrogen (N) fertilizer application is common in maize production. Optimizing N application rates and developing fertilization strategies that balance high yield, N-use efficiency, and environmental sustainability are therefore critical for green maize production. Based on a two-year stationary field experiment, this study systematically evaluated the effects of different N application rates on maize yield, N-use efficiency, N cycling and balance within the soil–crop system, and greenhouse gas emissions from farmland. Four treatments were established: no N control (N0, 0 kg N ha−1), low N (N1, 120 kg N ha−1), medium N (N2, 180 kg N ha−1), and high N (N3, 240 kg N ha−1). Among the N-fertilized treatments, N2 provided the best overall balance between maize yield, N-use efficiency, and environmental performance; N1 failed to achieve the high-yield target, whereas N3 increased potential environmental risks despite further yield gains. Compared with N1 and N3, N2 increased maize yield by 14.6% and 4.1%, N recovery efficiency (NRE) by 2.6% and 26.8%, and N agronomic efficiency (NAE) by 9.8% and 51.8%, respectively. Although N1 exhibited the highest partial factor productivity of applied N (PFPN), its PFPN was 27.2% and 68.7% higher than those of N2 and N3, respectively. Increasing N application significantly increased soil N residues and greenhouse gas emissions. After the 2025 autumn harvest, mineral N residues in the 0–80 cm soil profile were 82.7, 138.9, 172.5, and 207.9 kg N ha−1 under N0, N1, N2, and N3, respectively, and declined with soil depth. Compared with N3, N2 reduced apparent N loss, soil mineral N residue, apparent N surplus, nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux by 47.8%, 17.0%, 26.2%, 25.5%, and 23.1%, respectively. Collectively, these results provide a theoretical and technical basis for high-yield, high-efficiency, and sustainable maize production in the black soil region of Heilongjiang Province.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Agronomy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Soil Science

Soil ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences