npj Materials Degradation· 2026Q1
Creep damage initiation in high-temperature steel: a comparative study of ferritic, martensitic and austenitic microstructures
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A correlative methodology integrating SEM, FIB, EBSD, EDX, TEM, image recognition, data analysis, and crystal plasticity simulations reveals that MnS inclusions drive creep cavity nucleation in Grade 91 steel, while grain boundary ferrite and M23C6 carbides dominate in 316H steel.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Premature failure of critical energy infrastructure caused by creep damage, threatens productivity and safety, emphasizing the need for robust methods to monitor and predict material performance. Creep damage nucleation in metals is driven by nano- and micro-structural features, but linking these early evolutions to later failure is complex. This study presents a correlative methodology integrating SEM, FIB, EBSD, EDX, TEM, image recognition, data analysis and crystal plasticity simulations to investigate creep cavity formation in ferritic Grade 91, martensitic Grade 91 and austenitic 316H steels. Results show that grain boundaries and localized deformation strongly influence creep cavity initiation. MnS inclusions drive cavity nucleation in Grade 91 steel, while grain boundary ferrite and M 23 C 6 carbides dominate in 316H steel. Calibrating a crystal-plasticity framework with experimentally identified precursors reveals that deformation, inclusions and precipitates translate into damage-sensitive indicators such as slip rate hotspots and volumetric strain, enabling prediction of early creep cavity nucleation mechanisms.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. npj Materials Degradation, 2026 · DOI ↗
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways, key points and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical EngineeringEngineering