Law and Critique· 2026Q2
Blueberry Workers, Legal Change, Resistance, and Accommodation in the Coastal North of Peru
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Blueberry workers in Peru protested precarious labor conditions in 2020, achieving legal changes that improved working conditions but ultimately served as accommodation rather than resistance, reinforcing co-option dynamics that limit organizing capacity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Blueberry workers in Peru protested precarious labor conditions in 2020.
- The protests aimed to change the agrarian labor regime and achieve legal improvements.
- The achieved legal changes are characterized as accommodation, not resistance, as they did not challenge the underlying economic model.
- The reforms reinforced co-option dynamics, curtailing workers' capacity to organize and pursue systemic change.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract This article examines the protests of blueberry workers in Peru in 2020 against an agrarian labour regime that legalizes precarious labour conditions, as well as the aftermath of that mobilization. It investigates whether the legal change demanded and achieved can be categorized as resistance, understood as oppositional acts seeking rupture with the system, or as its opposite, accommodation, meaning reformist acts of opposition, acceptance and co-option. The analysis of the workers' mobilization in Peru tells a straightforward story about the function of law in constituting the rules of agrarian capitalism by distributing resources, such as land, into the hands of a few and legitimating unequal bargaining power to the detriment of workers. The findings suggest that the workers' protest constituted an act of accommodation: while it aimed to improve working conditions, it did not seek to overcome the underlying features and dynamics of the agrarian economic model that led to the entrenchment of precarity, unfreedom, and low levels of unionisation. While the mobilization did achieve legal change, its aftermath indicates that workers' actions were accommodating because they reinforced dynamics of co-option that curtail their capacity to organize and engage with projects of rupture.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Law and Critique, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
General Agricultural and Biological SciencesAgricultural and Biological Sciences