PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Buildings· 2026Q1

Why She Stays: A Role-Based Analysis of Women’s Motivations in Construction

Aba Essanowa Afful, Cynthia Wang, Riza Yosia Sunindijo, Benjamin Baah et al.

Short summary

Personal and social factors, particularly interest in construction subjects (21.0%) and early exposure (20.8%), are stronger motivators for women entering construction than financial incentives (3.3%), with these patterns varying by job role (on-site, off-site, fluid).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Personal interest in construction subjects (21.0%) and early exposure (20.8%) are the top motivators for women in construction.
  • Financial incentives are the least cited motivator, accounting for only 3.3% of coded quotations.
  • Motivational factors align with three theories: career choice, social cognitive career, and social capital.
  • Motivational patterns for women differ significantly across on-site, off-site, and fluid job roles within the industry.
  • A role-sensitive motivational framework is developed to guide industry strategies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The construction industry is actively promoting female participation, but the motivation to drive their entry and stay, particularly into different job roles, remains underexplored. Previous studies typically treated extrinsic motivation as a single, undifferentiated construct. This study therefore examines the motivations shaping women’s entry into the construction industry across on-site, off-site, and fluid job roles. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 female construction professionals in Australia across different roles. Data were thematically analysed using ATLAS.ti (version 25), producing twelve initial codes that were refined into seven core motivational codes and synthesised into three key motivational factors. The three main identified factors aligned with three distinct theories: intrinsic drivers with career choice theory, career opportunities with social cognitive career theory, and external/social drivers with social capital theory. Across 428 coded quotations, personal and social factors outweighed financial considerations. Interest in construction subjects/studies (21.0%) and early exposure (20.8%) were most frequently cited, while financial incentives were least cited (3.3%). Finally, motivational patterns were found to vary across the three roles. This study developed a role-sensitive motivational framework that is informed by the intrinsic/extrinsic career choice model to explain women’s motivations across construction roles and to guide the design of recruitment, education, and career pathway strategies in male-dominated industries.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Buildings, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Management Science and Operations Research

Management Science and Operations ResearchDecision Sciences