International Journal of Control· 2017Q2
FORCES NLP: an efficient implementation of interior-point methods for multistage nonlinear nonconvex programs
- 236citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2017year
Short summary
FORCES NLP achieves QP-solver speeds for nonlinear programs (NLPs) by using an interior-point method with approximate Hessians and adaptive barrier rules, outperforming IPOPT by up to 10x.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- FORCES NLP solves nonlinear programs (NLPs) with computation times similar to fast convex quadratic programming (QP) solvers.
- The method uses an interior-point approach with approximate Hessians and adaptive barrier rules.
- It leverages standard nonlinear programming building blocks and a structure-exploiting linear system solver.
- Demonstrated significant control performance improvements in three examples.
- Up to 10x faster than the state-of-the-art interior-point solver IPOPT.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Real-time implementation of optimisation-based control and trajectory planning can be very challenging for nonlinear systems. As a result, if an implementation based on a fixed linearisation is not suitable, the nonlinear problems are typically locally approximated online, in order to leverage the speed and robustness of embedded solvers for convex quadratic programs (QP) developed during the last decade. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that, using simple standard building blocks from nonlinear programming, combined with a structure-exploiting linear system solver, it is possible to achieve computation times in the range typical of solvers for QPs, while retaining nonlinearities and solving the nonlinear programs (NLP) to local optimality. The implemented algorithm is an interior-point method with approximate Hessians and adaptive barrier rules, and is provided as an extension to the C code generator FORCES. Three detailed examples are provided that illustrate a significant improvement in control performance when solving NLPs, with computation times that are comparable with those achieved by fast approximate schemes and up to an order of magnitude faster than the state-of-the-art interior-point solver IPOPT.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Control, 2017 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Numerical Analysis
Numerical AnalysisMathematics