PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics· 2013Q2

Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis

Hae‐Yeong Kim

Short summary

Skewness and kurtosis offer a more reliable method for assessing data normality across small and large sample sizes, unlike eyeball tests or formal normality tests which have limitations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Eyeball tests for normality are useful for n > 50 but not for small samples.
  • Formal normality tests (Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov) are suitable for small to medium samples (n < 300) but can be unreliable for large samples.
  • Skewness (asymmetry) and kurtosis (peakedness) provide a more consistent assessment of normality across both small and large sample sizes.
  • Statistical packages typically provide skewness and kurtosis values along with their standard errors.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

As discussed in the previous statistical notes, although many statistical methods have been proposed to test normality of data in various ways, there is no current gold standard method. The eyeball test may be useful for medium to large sized (e.g., n > 50) samples, however may not useful for small samples. The formal normality tests including Shapiro-Wilk test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test may be used from small to medium sized samples (e.g., n < 300), but may be unreliable for large samples. Moreover we may be confused because ‘eyeball test’ and ‘formal normality test’ may show incompatible results for the same data. To resolve the problem, another method of assessing normality using skewness and kurtosis of the distribution may be used, which may be relatively correct in both small samples and large samples. 1) Skewness and kurtosis Skewness is a measure of the asymmetry and kurtosis is a measure of ’peakedness’ of a distribution. Most statistical packages give you values of skewness and kurtosis as well as their standard errors.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Statistics and Probability

Statistics and ProbabilityMathematics