PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Annals of Surgery· 2012Q1

Use and Dissemination of the Brisbane 2000 Nomenclature of Liver Anatomy and Resections

Steven M. Strasberg, Carolyn S. Phillips

Short summary

Ten years after its introduction, the Brisbane 2000 Nomenclature for liver anatomy and resections has seen significant global adoption, with usage of its standardized terms increasing dramatically.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Standardized liver terminology (Brisbane 2000) shows increased adoption globally.
  • Usage of 'right and left hemihepatectomy/hepatectomy' rose from <50% to >80% in Americas/Asia post-2000.
  • Unique terms like 'sectionectomy' and 'trisectionectomy' also saw sharp increases in use.
  • Adoption is worldwide but remains incomplete.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Brisbane 2000 Nomenclature of Hepatic Anatomy and Resections was created to standardize terminology in an area, which previously was characterized by redundant and confusing terms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use and dissemination of the nomenclature 10 years after its introduction. METHODS: Two strategies were used to evaluate implementation of the terminology. The first depended on an examination of terms used to describe the anatomy and resection of one half of the liver over the 20-year period from 1990 to 2009. The second approach evaluated the use of the terms "section," "sectionectomy," and "trisectionectomy," which, in reference to the liver, are unique to the Brisbane 2000 Nomenclature. RESULTS: The use of the Brisbane 2000 terms "right and left hemihepatectomy/hepatectomy" increased dramatically versus the use of the discarded terms "right and left hepatic lobectomy" after the Nomenclature was introduced in 2000. This was especially true in the Americas and Asia where the terms were used in less than 50% of papers from 1990 to 1999 but reached 80% utilization by 2006. Likewise, use of the terms "section," "sectionectomy," and "trisectionectomy" increased sharply especially in between 2006 and 2009. CONCLUSIONS: The Brisbane terminology is being adopted worldwide but its adoption is still incomplete.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Annals of Surgery, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Anatomy

AnatomyMedicine