PofoliaPofolia ile paylaşıldı

New England Journal of Medicine· 2015Q1

Kardiyak Cerrahi Sonrası Liberal veya Kısıtlayıcı Transfüzyon

Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion after Cardiac Surgery

Gavin J. Murphy, Katie Pike, Chris Rogers, Sarah Wordsworth ve diğerleri

Kısa özet

Kardiyak cerrahi sonrası kısıtlayıcı kırmızı kan hücresi transfüzyon eşiği (<7.5 g/dL hemoglobin), liberal eşiğe (<9 g/dL) kıyasla 3 ay içinde ciddi enfeksiyon veya iskemik olayları azaltmada üstün değildi ve daha fazla ölüme neden oldu (%4.2'ye karşı %2.6).

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Ana noktalar

  • Kardiyak cerrahi sonrası kısıtlayıcı transfüzyon eşiği (<7.5 g/dL hemoglobin), liberal eşiğe (<9 g/dL) kıyasla 3 ay içinde ciddi enfeksiyon veya iskemik olayları azaltmada üstün değildi.
  • Kısıtlayıcı eşik, mortalitede istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir artışla ilişkilendirildi (%4.2'ye karşı %2.6).
  • Transfüzyon oranları, liberal gruba (%92.2) kıyasla kısıtlayıcı grupta (%53.4) önemli ölçüde düşüktü.
  • Sağlık hizmeti maliyetleri iki transfüzyon stratejisi arasında anlamlı bir farklılık göstermedi.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Özet (abstract)

BACKGROUND: Whether a restrictive threshold for hemoglobin level in red-cell transfusions, as compared with a liberal threshold, reduces postoperative morbidity and health care costs after cardiac surgery is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, parallel-group trial in which patients older than 16 years of age who were undergoing nonemergency cardiac surgery were recruited from 17 centers in the United Kingdom. Patients with a postoperative hemoglobin level of less than 9 g per deciliter were randomly assigned to a restrictive transfusion threshold (hemoglobin level <7.5 g per deciliter) or a liberal transfusion threshold (hemoglobin level <9 g per deciliter). The primary outcome was a serious infection (sepsis or wound infection) or an ischemic event (permanent stroke [confirmation on brain imaging and deficit in motor, sensory, or coordination functions], myocardial infarction, infarction of the gut, or acute kidney injury) within 3 months after randomization. Health care costs, excluding the index surgery, were estimated from the day of surgery to 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 2007 patients underwent randomization; 4 participants withdrew, leaving 1000 in the restrictive-threshold group and 1003 in the liberal-threshold group. Transfusion rates after randomization were 53.4% and 92.2% in the two groups, respectively. The primary outcome occurred in 35.1% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group and 33.0% of the patients in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.34; P=0.30); there was no indication of heterogeneity according to subgroup. There were more deaths in the restrictive-threshold group than in the liberal-threshold group (4.2% vs. 2.6%; hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.67; P=0.045). Serious postoperative complications, excluding primary-outcome events, occurred in 35.7% of participants in the restrictive-threshold group and 34.2% of participants in the liberal-threshold group. Total costs did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: A restrictive transfusion threshold after cardiac surgery was not superior to a liberal threshold with respect to morbidity or health care costs. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment program; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN70923932.).

Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. New England Journal of Medicine, 2015 · DOI ↗

ÇıkarımlarPremium
Makaleye SorÜcretsiz hesapla

Ücretsiz hesapla devam et

Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.

Web'de ücretsiz devam et

Google ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.

Telefonda:

Alan: Biyokimya (Tıp)

BiochemistryMedicine