Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science· 2026Q2
Evaluation of inert gases as alternatives to Carbon Dioxide for stunning pigs: effects on gas stability, effectiveness and animal welfare
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Argon (Ar) and Ar/CO₂ mixtures significantly reduced aversive behaviors in pigs during stunning compared to 100% CO₂, with ArCO₂ showing mild responses and Ar resulting in the slowest loss of posture.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The European Union requires pigs to be stunned before slaughter, with Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) being the most common method, although it is increasingly criticized for its aversiveness. This study evaluated inert gases for stability, effectiveness, and animal welfare. Ten gas mixtures were pre-tested in a plexiglass box, with 100% Argon (Ar), 85% Argon/15% CO₂ (ArCO₂), and 50% Argon/50% Nitrogen (ArN₂) selected for animal trials. A total of 160 piglets (30–50 kg) were stunned and slaughtered, with CO₂ serving as standard method. All gases remained stable under experimental conditions, and weather had no influence. Carbon Dioxide elicited strong aversive reactions. Mild responses occurred with ArCO₂. Loss of posture occurred the fastest in CO₂, and the slowest in Ar. In conclusion, inert gases and their mixtures provided effective stunning with markedly reduced aversive behaviour compared to CO₂, although requiring longer exposure times. Further validation is recommended under commercial slaughter conditions.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science, 2026 · DOI ↗
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways, key points and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openAnimal Science and ZoologyAgricultural and Biological Sciences