PofoliaShared via Pofolia

PhytoKeys· 2026Q2

Species delimitation and taxonomic revision of the Rhamnella franguloides complex (Rhamnaceae)

Qianna An, Zhiqiang Lu, Xiaolong Zhou

Short summary

Morphological and ITS DNA data reveal three distinct species within the Rhamnella franguloides complex: R. franguloides, R. congesta, and R. caudata, challenging previous taxonomic treatments.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Three distinct species (R. franguloides, R. congesta, R. caudata) are recognized within the Rhamnella franguloides complex.
  • Species boundaries were defined using morphological clustering, geographic distribution, and ITS DNA sequence variation.
  • The two varieties of R. franguloides are differentiated by petiole length.
  • The recognized species are largely or completely allopatric.
  • Microrhamnus taquetii is confirmed as a synonym of Euonymus alatus, not R. franguloides.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Integrative species delimitation requires at least two independent lines of evidence, such as morphological and molecular data. Rhamnella franguloides (including its synonyms and the varieties inaequilatera and franguloides ) and R. caudata constitute a complex with poorly defined morphological boundaries. Here, we investigated species boundaries within this complex. Consistent with previous treatments, we recognized Microrhamnus taquetii as a synonym of Euonymus alatus , rather than of R. franguloides . Population-level morphological clustering and comparison based on all available specimens, together with geographic distributions, supported the recognition of at least three distinct clusters corresponding to three species in this complex: R. franguloides , R. congesta (S.Moore) Z.Qiang Lu & X.L.Zhou, and R. caudata . In addition, the two varieties of R. franguloides are distinguished by markedly different petiole lengths. These three species and two varieties are completely or largely allopatric, and their newly defined morphological boundaries and corresponding taxonomic treatments differ substantially from those proposed previously. Sequence variation in the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region strongly supported the genetic distinction among the three species. Phylogenetic analysis based on ITS sequences indicated that the well-supported R. congesta clade was sister to another well-supported clade comprising R. franguloides and R. caudata . This study highlights the importance of integrating multiple lines of evidence in species delimitation and taxonomic revision.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PhytoKeys, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsAgricultural and Biological Sciences