PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Systems and Software· 2026Q1

Bridging 22,000 voices: A teaching case on infrastructure for user representatives in large-scale agile software development

Morteza Moalagh

Short summary

A European public welfare administration established a structured user-involvement infrastructure with regional coordinators and local agents to gather feedback from over 22,000 employees during a shift to large-scale agile software development.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A public welfare administration shifted from outsourced to large-scale agile software development.
  • Previous ICT modernization failed due to misalignments from insufficient frontline employee involvement.
  • A new user-involvement infrastructure was created with regional coordinators and local change agents.
  • Over 22,000 employees were engaged to gather representative user feedback.
  • The case highlights challenges in representation, knowledge sharing, and bureaucracy in distributed public-sector settings.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This teaching case examines how a large European public welfare administration redesigned its approach to user participation during a major transition from outsourced development to large-scale agile and product-based software engineering. Drawing on the organization’s decade-long digitalization history and the failure of a major ICT modernization program, the case illustrates how insufficient involvement of frontline employees created misalignments between digitalization and operational work. After 2016, the administration introduced a structured user-involvement infrastructure, built around regional implementation coordinators and local change agents, to facilitate communication, coordinate training, and gather representative user feedback from more than 22,000 employees. The case highlights the complexities of scaling user involvement in distributed public-sector settings and underscores tensions around representation, knowledge sharing, and organizational bureaucracy. It enables students to analyze socio-technical coordination challenges and evaluate the effectiveness of representative user participation in large-scale agile development.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Systems and Software, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Information Systems

Information SystemsComputer Science