Autism Research· 2026Q1
Electroconvulsive Therapy for Catatonia in Autistic and Non‐Autistic Patients: An Observational Study on Course, Efficacy, Aggression, and Self‐Injury Outcomes
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Autistic patients, especially those with intellectual disability, received longer maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) courses for catatonia compared to non-autistic patients (median 342 vs. 97 days), but not more intensive acute treatment.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Autistic patients received longer ECT maintenance treatment (median 342 days) than non-autistic patients (median 97 days).
- This difference was driven by longer retention in maintenance ECT, not a higher acute treatment rate.
- Clinical improvement was high in both groups: 100% of autistic patients and 89.1% of non-autistic patients showed CGI-I response.
- Self-injury prevalence decreased from 42.9% to 17.1% among autistic patients treated with ECT.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Catatonia occurs disproportionately in autistic individuals and may respond to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), yet prior reports suggest greater treatment burden in this population. We compared longitudinal ECT utilization, safety, and clinical outcomes between autistic and non-autistic patients with catatonia. This single-center observational cohort included 110 patients treated from May 2022 through April 2026, comprising 43 autistic and 67 non-autistic patients. Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), and Kanner Catatonia Severity and Examination scores were recorded across acute and maintenance treatment. Because the cohorts differed in age, biologic sex, and intellectual disability, treatment burden was evaluated using covariate-adjusted, censoring-aware models with a three-level clinical-group variable comprising non-autism, autism with intellectual disability, and autism without intellectual disability. Autistic patients received more ECT sessions than non-autistic patients (median, 35 vs. 14) over longer observed treatment courses (median, 342 vs. 97 days). After adjustment, this difference reflected longer retention in maintenance ECT rather than a higher treatment rate and was concentrated among autistic patients with intellectual disability (Cox hazard ratio, 0.21). Clinical improvement was observed in both cohorts: CGI-I response occurred in 100.0% of autistic and 89.1% of non-autistic patients, BFCRS reduction of at least 50% occurred in 76.9% and 75.4%, and CGI-S improvement of at least 1 point occurred in 85.0% and 70.8%, respectively. Kanner total scores decreased significantly, and self-injury prevalence declined from 42.9% to 17.1% among autistic patients. Combativeness improved in both cohorts, and documented adverse events were uncommon. ECT was associated with substantial clinical improvement in autistic and non-autistic patients with catatonia. Autistic patients, particularly those with intellectual disability, experienced longer maintenance courses rather than more intensive treatment, underscoring the importance of sustained treatment access.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Autism Research, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Psychiatry and Mental health
Psychiatry and Mental healthMedicine