International Journal of Construction Management· 2026Q1
Productivity, institutional environments, and international contract success: asymmetric moderation evidence from Japanese construction firms
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Firm productivity is positively linked to international contract count and marginally to contract value for Japanese construction firms, with stronger institutional environments concentrating awards but asymmetrically boosting the value of successful contracts.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Firm productivity is positively associated with the number of international contracts secured by Japanese construction firms.
- Productivity has a positive but only marginal association with the total value of international contracts.
- Stronger host-country institutional environments are linked to fewer contracts, indicating a concentration of awards.
- Institutional environments asymmetrically moderate productivity's impact: productivity advantages translate more strongly into contract value in stronger institutional settings.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
International projects are central to construction firms’ growth, yet whether firm productivity predicts international contract success and why productivity advantages translate differently across institutional settings remain underexplored. This study examines how firm productivity and host-country institutional environments jointly shape international contract success among publicly listed Japanese construction firms. Using firm-level panel data for 2000–2024, drawn exclusively from Official Development Assistance (ODA) and World Bank–financed procurement, and a contract-value-weighted Institutional Environment Index, two-step System Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) estimation examines contract value and contract count as complementary success dimensions. Firm productivity is positively and robustly associated with contract count, and positively but only marginally with contract value, providing direct firm-level evidence of a link previously theorised but not established. Institutional environments do not produce uniformly positive effects: stronger institutions are associated with fewer contracts, suggesting they concentrate awards rather than broaden access. Critically, institutions moderate productivity payoffs asymmetrically: in stronger settings, productivity advantages translate more strongly into contract value, whereas no comparable effect emerges for contract frequency. These findings advance the institution-based view by showing that institutional environments function primarily as payoff-structuring mechanisms shaping how firm-level capabilities are evaluated and rewarded in international construction procurement.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Construction Management, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Management Science and Operations Research
Management Science and Operations ResearchDecision Sciences