PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2021Q1

Hypothermia versus Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Josef Dankiewicz, Tobias Cronberg, Gisela Lilja, Janus Christian Jakobsen et al.

Short summary

Targeted hypothermia (33°C) did not reduce 6-month mortality or improve functional outcomes compared to normothermia (≥37.8°C) in comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n=1850). Arrhythmias were more frequent with hypothermia.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Targeted hypothermia (33°C) did not significantly lower 6-month mortality compared to normothermia (≥37.8°C) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (50% vs. 48% mortality).
  • Functional outcomes at 6 months were similar between groups, with 55% in both experiencing moderate-to-severe disability (mRS ≥4).
  • Arrhythmias resulting in hemodynamic compromise were more common in the hypothermia group (24%) than the normothermia group (17%).
  • No significant differences were observed in other prespecified adverse events like pneumonia, sepsis, or bleeding.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Targeted temperature management is recommended for patients after cardiac arrest, but the supporting evidence is of low certainty. METHODS: In an open-label trial with blinded assessment of outcomes, we randomly assigned 1900 adults with coma who had had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac or unknown cause to undergo targeted hypothermia at 33°C, followed by controlled rewarming, or targeted normothermia with early treatment of fever (body temperature, ≥37.8°C). The primary outcome was death from any cause at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included functional outcome at 6 months as assessed with the modified Rankin scale. Prespecified subgroups were defined according to sex, age, initial cardiac rhythm, time to return of spontaneous circulation, and presence or absence of shock on admission. Prespecified adverse events were pneumonia, sepsis, bleeding, arrhythmia resulting in hemodynamic compromise, and skin complications related to the temperature management device. RESULTS: A total of 1850 patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. At 6 months, 465 of 925 patients (50%) in the hypothermia group had died, as compared with 446 of 925 (48%) in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.14; P = 0.37). Of the 1747 patients in whom the functional outcome was assessed, 488 of 881 (55%) in the hypothermia group had moderately severe disability or worse (modified Rankin scale score ≥4), as compared with 479 of 866 (55%) in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.09). Outcomes were consistent in the prespecified subgroups. Arrhythmia resulting in hemodynamic compromise was more common in the hypothermia group than in the normothermia group (24% vs. 17%, P<0.001). The incidence of other adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with coma after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, targeted hypothermia did not lead to a lower incidence of death by 6 months than targeted normothermia. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; TTM2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02908308.).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2021 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Emergency Medicine

Emergency MedicineMedicine